Publish Date :
Cautious Christmas Shoppers: Is Your Stock in the Right Products?
A cautious Christmas customer does not necessarily want less of every product; the mix of value, gifts and discretionary purchases may change. Merchmix Core and Atlas help the team compare that mix with the stock and intake already planned.
THE MERCHMIX DECISION / Core + Atlas
The units hold. The mix changes.
Compare entry-price, mid-price and premium demand rather than cut the whole range.
Worked retail example. Independent of the reported company records. Financial scenario amounts are USD.
Gift range / demand by price point
Entry price / mid-price / premium · 400 units in both views
Total demand stays at 400. Mid-price needs ten fewer; premium needs thirty fewer.
400 expected units generate $17,400 across the three price points.
THE KEY IDEA
Protect the customer proposition at product level. A steady unit total can still leave the wrong stock and a lower sales-value plan if the range mix changes.
Keep the evidence in its proper period
Pureprofile’s 26 October 2026 Australian Christmas survey found that 35% of respondents planned to spend less on gifts and 79% were adjusting their spending. Its online panel covered 1,015 Australian residents aged 18 to 64. These are stated intentions from that sample, not observed sales for an individual retailer or a forecast for every customer.
Coles’ September Christmas announcement provides a separate example of a retailer using loyalty offers to support value-conscious customers. It does not establish the same response across every product or shopper. Together, the sources prompt a practical question: does the current range match the price points and products customers are now choosing?
A balanced total can hide an unbalanced range
A range can carry enough units overall while offering too little depth in the products customers still choose. Examine the customer proposition and price architecture before treating slow sales as a need for blanket markdowns.
Core supports range, option and budget planning. Compare expected demand by the relevant merchandise area and selling period, then consider whether the option count and depth still match that demand.
Value does not always mean the lowest ticket. A trusted gift, a useful core item or a relevant loyalty benefit can change the customer’s choice in different ways. Compare those choices at the product and price-point level; a category-wide discount can obscure which part of the range customers still want at its intended price.
A mix shift without a change in total demand
A separate gift retailer plans to sell 400 units: 200 entry-price items, 120 mid-price items and 80 premium items. Its revised view remains 400, but changes the mix to 240, 110 and 50. The total forecast has not fallen.
Against the original mix, the entry-price group needs 40 more units, while the mid-price and premium groups need 10 and 30 fewer. At assumed ticket prices of $25, $50 and $80, expected sales value changes from $17,400 to $15,500. Those are USD scenario assumptions, not customer data from Pureprofile or Coles.
THE FIGURES BEHIND THE DECISION
| Price group | Original units | Revised units | Ticket |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 200 | 240 | $25 |
| Mid price | 120 | 110 | $50 |
| Premium | 80 | 50 | $80 |
240 × $25 + 110 × $50 + 50 × $80 = $15,500
Turn the product mix into a buying requirement
The lower value does not mean 1,900 fewer dollars should be translated mechanically into a single unit reduction. The scenario has the same 400 units and a different average price.
In Core, keep the unit, price and mix assumptions visible alongside the intake. Review existing orders before adding depth to the entry-price group; the other commitments do not disappear when the preferred mix changes.
Check whether the weak seller was actually available
Atlas supports scoped sales, stock and margin reporting. Compare the relevant groups over the same trading weeks, including availability and distribution where the underlying data supports them.
A premium item may appear weak because a core size was unavailable, rather than because customers rejected the price. Conversely, a value line may sell quickly from a small starting quantity without justifying a large repeat order.
A product-mix decision needs both units and value
A stronger entry-price forecast does not automatically justify increasing the entire category buy. In this example the total unit forecast is unchanged. Moving demand towards cheaper products reduces expected sales value, so the financial plan and the option-level quantity plan need to be read together.
Check whether the business already has the extra entry-price units in stock or on order. Then inspect the mid-price and premium commitments that no longer match expected demand. Core connects that range discussion to the MFP/WSSI assumptions; Atlas helps compare the relevant price points and periods. A broad consumer survey can prompt this review, but the retailer’s own available-stock and trading evidence must support the final change.
| Signal | Merchmix workspace | Decision to review |
|---|---|---|
| Demand moves towards entry price | Core / assortment plan | Check stock and intake before increasing the lower-price buy. |
| Unit totals hold but sales value falls | Core / MFP/WSSI | Reconcile the revised mix with the financial plan. |
| A price point sells slowly | Atlas / sales and stock | Check availability and exposure before concluding that customer preference has changed. |
Treat the offer and the stock plan as related decisions
A loyalty offer, a targeted promotion and an end-of-season markdown have different purposes and economics. Establish the intended demand effect and the stock available to support it before committing to the offer.
The next review should identify which mix assumption changed, which incoming stock is already committed and what response is permitted. It should not infer customer loyalty or promotion uplift from an isolated sell-through percentage.
BEFORE THE NEXT DECISION
- Buyer
Check whether stock and intake already support the extra forty entry-price units.
- Planner
Carry the revised $15,500 sales value into the same financial planning period.
- Trading team
Compare price-point demand with availability before changing the range again.
Common questions
Does cautious spending mean every category will decline?
No. Demand can shift between products and price points even when total units stay unchanged.
Does the example assume fewer units?
No. Both views contain 400 units; the mix and sales value change.
Does Merchmix run the Coles loyalty offer?
No relationship or loyalty-platform capability is asserted. The announcement is background context.
How recent are the sources?
The spending-intentions survey was published by Pureprofile on 26 October 2026. The separate Coles loyalty announcement is dated September 2026; neither source supplies the worked example’s product-level demand figures.
Does a loyalty offer prove that demand will rise?
No. It changes the offer for eligible shoppers. Measure its relevant sales, stock and price-point response rather than applying a general uplift to the whole range.
FROM THE ARTICLE TO YOUR OWN RETAIL PLAN
Review the decision.
See the workflow.
Bring your planning questions to a demo, or explore a proof of concept on your own data.